Comments on: Free Energy? http://www.junyor.net/2006/08/21/free-energy/ The Blog Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:48:05 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: free fta http://www.junyor.net/2006/08/21/free-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-8380 free fta Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:29:56 +0000 http://www.junyor.net/2006/08/21/free-energy/#comment-8380 Hello, for a long time I read your blog, thanks for that that write interesting and useful posts.I consider that blogers it is possible to name many journalists. <br><br>Good luck Hello, for a long time I read your blog, thanks for that that write interesting and useful posts.I consider that blogers it is possible to name many journalists.

Good luck

]]> By: Steorn at Free Roaming http://www.junyor.net/2006/08/21/free-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-399 Steorn at Free Roaming Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:28:31 +0000 http://www.junyor.net/2006/08/21/free-energy/#comment-399 [...] Numerous sources mention Irish company Steorn today. Here is the blurb [...] [...] Numerous sources mention Irish company Steorn today. Here is the blurb [...]

]]> By: Codiac http://www.junyor.net/2006/08/21/free-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-398 Codiac Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:34:18 +0000 http://www.junyor.net/2006/08/21/free-energy/#comment-398 Ummm.... Unified wave theory is possible. It's just using an equation complex enough to model "everything" all at once. It will include the laws of thermodynamics. This is, quite simply, a case where they're getting energy from somewhere other than what they're measuring or their equations are wrong. Those are the only two possible alternatives. Well, other than God himself stepping in. I won't get into that, though. Ummm….

Unified wave theory is possible. It’s just using an equation complex enough to model “everything” all at once. It will include the laws of thermodynamics.

This is, quite simply, a case where they’re getting energy from somewhere other than what they’re measuring or their equations are wrong. Those are the only two possible alternatives.

Well, other than God himself stepping in. I won’t get into that, though.

]]> By: Oracle http://www.junyor.net/2006/08/21/free-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-397 Oracle Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:24:13 +0000 http://www.junyor.net/2006/08/21/free-energy/#comment-397 True, as the law of thermodynamics dictates that energy is neither lost nor gained, that being said one must realize that there are other factors that remove energy from a semi-closed system (exa heat or friction). With that being said I would have to agree with Codiac on that one, there is no such thing as 'free' energy. But with the introduction of M theory (basicly its the unified wave theory) I wonder what else is out there, I didn't even expect that such a thing could have been accomplished at this state. True, as the law of thermodynamics dictates that energy is neither lost nor gained, that being said one must realize that there are other factors that remove energy from a semi-closed system (exa heat or friction). With that being said I would have to agree with Codiac on that one, there is no such thing as ‘free’ energy. But with the introduction of M theory (basicly its the unified wave theory) I wonder what else is out there, I didn’t even expect that such a thing could have been accomplished at this state.

]]> By: Junyor http://www.junyor.net/2006/08/21/free-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-396 Junyor Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:56:00 +0000 http://www.junyor.net/2006/08/21/free-energy/#comment-396 So what, no free energy? So what, no free energy?

]]> By: Codiac http://www.junyor.net/2006/08/21/free-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-395 Codiac Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:20:30 +0000 http://www.junyor.net/2006/08/21/free-energy/#comment-395 Okay, after having watched the video, I'm gonna have to say that there's an energy source that's being tapped somewhere that someone is missing in their analysis of this process. If I had to guess, I'd go with Occam's Razor and say that they aren't factoring in the energy required to generate and maintain the magnetic fields used to propel the particle. A variation on a mistake that has often left many engineering and physics students sitting around, scratching their heads, and saying, "WTF am I missing here?!" Okay, after having watched the video, I’m gonna have to say that there’s an energy source that’s being tapped somewhere that someone is missing in their analysis of this process. If I had to guess, I’d go with Occam’s Razor and say that they aren’t factoring in the energy required to generate and maintain the magnetic fields used to propel the particle. A variation on a mistake that has often left many engineering and physics students sitting around, scratching their heads, and saying, “WTF am I missing here?!”

]]> By: Codiac http://www.junyor.net/2006/08/21/free-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-394 Codiac Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:07:53 +0000 http://www.junyor.net/2006/08/21/free-energy/#comment-394 Bah. Anyone who purports to have broken the laws of thermodynamics automatically loses all credibility with me. If it turns out I am mistaken, I will, of course, retract that statement. However... If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's usually a duck. Quack, quack. Bah.

Anyone who purports to have broken the laws of thermodynamics automatically loses all credibility with me.

If it turns out I am mistaken, I will, of course, retract that statement. However…

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s usually a duck.

Quack, quack.

]]>