Pluto, not very big
Who knew people thought a dog was a planet?
Pluto Demoted: No Longer a Planet in Highly Controversial Definition
By Robert Roy Britt
Senior Science Writer
posted: 24 August 2006
09:35 am ETCapping years of intense debate, astronomers resolved today to demote Pluto in a wholesale redefinition of planethood that is being billed as a victory of scientific reasoning over historic and cultural influences. But already the decision is being hotly debated.
Officially, Pluto is no longer a planet.
"Pluto is dead," said Caltech researcher Mike Brown, who spoke with reporters via a teleconference while monitoring the vote. The decision also means a Pluto-sized object that Brown discovered will not be called a planet.
"Pluto is not a planet," Brown said. "There are finally, officially, eight planets in the solar system."
The vote involved just 424 astronomers who remained for the last day of a meeting of the International Astronomical Union (IAU) in Prague.
"I'm embarassed for astornomy," said Alan Stern, leader of NASA's New Horizon's mission to Pluto and a scientist at the Southwest Research Institute. "Less than 5 percent of the world's astronomers voted."
"This definition stinks, for technical reasons," Stern told SPACE.com. He expects the astronomy community to overturn the decision. Other astronomers criticized the definition as ambiguous.
Naturalists
Heard this on the radio during the morning commute. Great commentary.
-----
Commentary: Naturalists
By Lee Cullum, KERA 90.1 Commentator
DALLAS, TX (2006-08-24)We are so divorced from nature most of the time that it's startling to meet what once was called a naturalist. John James Audubon was a great naturalist. So were Teddy Roosevelt and Charles Darwin. And so is San Antonio lawyer Luke Kellogg who is more than an expert at hunting and fishing. He is a student of wildlife, weather and crops. He is an astute respecter of nature as well as the laws that govern the natural world. He does not play around with lightning. Nor does he allow anyone to wave a gun to the right or to the left. Straight ahead, he says, is the only way to shoot. Kellogg has the poise and confidence of somebody deeply rooted in the earth. Not for him the anxiety of those who flit about the land, never alighting in a place that truly feels like home.
This makes Luke Kellogg reliable in the air. He knows when it's foolish to fly in a six-seat plane. People of science, he said, sometimes make bad pilots. That's because they believe they can overcome nature. Isn't that what medicine teaches? How to use the science of nature to counteract or neutralize natural effects? It causes some, he explained, to understand the science, but not the art, of flying.
They are not the only ones who think they can have their way with the natural world. John McPhee wrote a book about some of the others called "The Control of Nature." In it he described how the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers mounted a Herculean campaign to keep the Mississippi from changing its course by a hundred miles, as it was wont to do. As this work explained, if the river moved its mouth by going down a tributary, the Atchafalaya, that would cut off New Orleans and Baton Rouge from river commerce. The Corps succeeded for the moment in saving the bayou city, but not forever, since Nature, as we now know, had other devastation in store.
I realized as I talked to Luke Kellogg that naturalists are different from environmentalists. Environmentalists are essential to our survival, but they may be entirely urban people who never see a sunset outside a city. They may deplore contaminated air and water, the extinction of species, the destruction of rain forests and global warming, but these can be intellectual or political interests, uninvolved with the passions of the heart.
Environmentalists seek to preserve things as they are, said Kellogg, and that's impossible. Naturalists, he explained, know they cannot "stop all encroachment and go back to the Garden of Eden," so they practice a "practical acceptance of change." They do not embrace the solution sometimes advanced by environmentalists to "get people off the land." Kellogg stresses that he and his compatriots want to conserve natural spaces, but "they can only manage them around the edges."
We need more naturalists in the world, more students of nature, including human nature, who understand the wisdom of Ecclesiastes, that there is a time for every purpose under heaven. The thing is to match experience to the moment, and not mistake one's own force for a force of nature itself. It could be called knowing when to fish and when to cut bait.
© Copyright 2006, KERA
Don’t Download this Song
the record store's where you belong. Go and buy the CD like you know that you should... You don't want to mess with the RIAA, they'll sue you if you burn that CDR, it doesn't matter if you are a grandma or a seven year old girl, they'll treat you like the evil hard bitten criminal scum you are.
Funny stuff from Wierd Al Yankovic. He has posted the song, "Don't Download this Song," from his upcoming album, "Straight Outta Lynwood" on his MySpace site. You can also send an e-card from this site. The video is also available for viewing from Yahoo Music.
Can't wait for the album to be released...September 26th.
Free Energy?
via http://www.alistreview.com/2006/08/steorn_gets_the_blogosphere_bu.html:
Steorn, an Irish technology company, has claimed to have developed "a technology that produces free, clean and constant energy." They issued a challenge for scientists to test the technology and more than 1300 have taken the bait.
From the website:
Steorn is making three claims for its technology:
- The technology has a coefficient of performance greater than 100%.
- The operation of the technology (i.e. the creation of energy) is not derived from the degradation of its component parts.
- There is no identifiable environmental source of the energy (as might be witnessed by a cooling of ambient air temperature).
The sum of these claims is that our technology creates free energy.
If it is true, what a leap forward. I have the feeling this is just a big hoax...
The Article:
Scientists flock to test 'free energy' discovery
David Smith
Sunday August 20, 2006
The ObserverA man who claims to have developed a free energy technology which could power everything from mobile phones to cars has received more than 400 applications from scientists to test it.
Sean McCarthy says that no one was more sceptical than he when Steorn, his small hi-tech firm in Dublin, hit upon a way of generating clean, free and constant energy from the interaction of magnetic fields. 'It wasn't so much a Eureka moment as a get-back-in-there-and-check-your-instruments moment, although in far more colourful language,' said McCarthy. But when he attempted to share his findings, he says, scientists either put the phone down on him or refused to endorse him publicly in case they damaged their academic reputations. So last week he took out a full-page advert in the Economist magazine, challenging the scientific community to examine his technology.McCarthy claims it provides five times the amount of energy a mobile phone battery generates for the same size, and does not have to be recharged. Within 36 hours of his advert appearing he had been contacted by 420 scientists in Europe, America and Australia, and a further 4,606 people had registered to receive the results.
And now, the video...
This means never having to recharge your phone, never having to refuel your car. A world with an infinite supply of clean energy for all.
Pacific Dead Zone Returns
From the ScienceNews Blog,
The AP reports that the Pacific Coasts' "dead zone" has returned. The dead zone was first discovered in 2002.
The oxygen-starved "dead zone" along the Pacific Coast that is causing massive crab and fish die-offs is worse than initially thought, scientists said.
Weather, not pollution, appears to be the culprit, scientists said, and no relief is in sight. However, some said there is no immediate sign of long-term damage to the crab fishery in the dead zone, a 70-mile stretch of water along the Continental Shelf between Florence and Lincoln City.
Oregon State University scientists looking for weather changes that could reverse the situation aren't finding them. They say levels of dissolved oxygen critical to marine life are the lowest since the first dead zone was identified in 2002. It has returned every year.
Strong upwelling winds pushed a low-oxygen pool of deep water toward shore, suffocating marine life, said Jane Lubchenco, a professor of marine biology at OSU.
The article says Oregon State University scientists saw a crab graveyard and thousands of dead sea creatures in the dead zone. Scientists are blaming low-oxygen water triggered by global warming for the dead zone. So far, the local commercial fishing industry has not been impacted.







